CBC’s censors at Viafoura and ICUC running interference for Hillary Clinton
I was just wondering, among other blatant examples of your ICUC/Viafoura comments section censorship and memory holing, where quoting the former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton violates CBC’s Code of Conduct? Specifically, quoting her from 2011 when she said, “We came, we saw, he died! Ha ha ha!” I mean, it’s not as if I point out that Khadaffi was sodomized before his death and cut open with a knife during and after his death. While he was on his way to surrender to the U.S-backed conquerors.
I guess that falls under the obscure “Violates the moderator’s political sensitivities” section.
Also, in articles dealing with gun violence, why do comments referring to the type of medication the shooter (any shooter, any incident) may have been on get “disabled?” Is it a case of CBC protecting its Big Pharma sponsors, or ICUC acting in its capacity of “on-line reputation management” for its Big Pharma clients.
Referring to BBC’s reporting on the collapse of Building Seven on September 11, 2001 (specifically where Jane Staneley reported the building had collapsed into a pile of rubble while it was still standing visible on live television outside the window of her studio / hotel room? Oh, yeah. “Content Disabled.”
It really makes no difference, you know. I just take all of my comments you people have censored and put them up on my own website, http://www.LettersToTheBeast.com, to show the world how petty you and your legion of censors worldwide really are. You ought the read the comments I get! And, by the way, spam excepted, I don’t “disable” mine.
There are other websites collecting censored CBC comments as well. Censored for no other reason than they obviously offend the censor personally. On a political level.
You do realize I own part of CBC, don’t you? As does virtually everybody else who participates in the comments forum?
There is nothing more dangerous than a cornered animal.
The government of israel has, in the past year, seen its authority around the planet challenged. When israel says, “jump,” the current president of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, is not asking, “how high?”
For a host of reasons, Canadians have thrown their Likudnik “Conservative” government out of office. Of course, it remains to be seen whether the new boss, Justin Trudeau, will be the same as the old boss, Stephen “Steve” Harper.
Benjamin Netanyahu’s behaviour has grown increasingly erratic and unpredictable since he channeled Wyle E. Coyote in front of the United Nations three years ago. Recently, Bibi became a holocaust revisionist when he claimed Haj Amin al-Husseini, Jerusalem’s Grand Mufti in 1941, suggested to Adolph Hitler “exterminate” all Jewish people in Germany, rather than merely relocate them to Palestine, as was Hitler’s inclination at the time (according to Netanyahu). Of course , besides challenging the orthodox historical narrative regarding wartime German history, Netanyahu’s claims fly in the face of israeli doctrine which states there was never any such place as “Palestine.” Not today. Not ever.
Never-ending wars in Syria, Iraq, Libya and Yemen (among other places) have caused a humanitarian crisis as swarms of Muslim refugees arrive in Europe. As they assimilate into their new countries, they are unlikely to be particularly sympathetic towards Europe’s traditional ruling class and are likely to take issue with historical narratives. Particularly in Germany. http://www.timesofisrael.com/german-jews-fear-backlash-from-countrys-welcome-of-refugees/ Talk about not thinking things through.
Arthur Topham, the webmaster behind The Radical Press (www.RadicalPress.com) is the latest victim of israel’s wrath this out for himself as he goes on trial for “hate speech.”
Mr. Topham was originally charged in November, 2012. According to Toronto’s National Post newspaper of November 6, 2012 (Stewart Bell, reporter) http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/b-c-man-charged-with-promoting-hatred-against-jews-on-website, the charges were instigated by Harry Abrams, a b’nai brith “volunteer” and serial SLAPP-suiter Richard Warman. B’nai brith is the branch office of the anti-defamantion league (adl) in Canada. And Warman has a storied history at now-defunct Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.
During its existence, Warman would regularly file complaints with the CHRT, seek large fines against purported offenders, and arrange for a portion of those fines to be directed towards himself. Warman’s behaviour can be confirmed by visiting the website of the CHRT (http://www.chrt-tcdp.gc.ca/NS/index-eng.asp) and searching “Warman.”
Warman was found to have joined “white supremacist” websites and posted inflammatory material from the point of view of a “white supremacist.” The decision runs over 20 pages, however, you may get to the good part by searching the word “admitted.”
The following is an except from the decision (bold text is LettersToTheBeast’s).
 The purpose of a Cease and Desist Order under s. 54 (1) (a) of the Act is to both remediate conduct found to be contrary to s. 13 (1) of the Act and to send a message to others that such conduct is not acceptable. In the present case, the Northern AllianceWebsite is no longer in existence as it was apparently sold to an unrelated party several years ago. Contrary to Mr. Warman’s Statement of Particulars, there is no evidence that the impugned conduct by the Respondents has continued to the present time. Instead it appears to have been discontinued well before the complaints were instituted. To a certain extent, there would not appear to be anything to remediate. However, one has no way of knowing whether the cessation of activity by the Respondents was related to a genuine understanding by the Respondents that their prior conduct was discriminatory and a firm resolve that it would not be repeated at any time in the future. To be on the safe side, therefore, I will make an Order along the lines requested by Mr. Warman under s. 54 (1) (a) of the Act. If the Respondents do not engage in the impugned conduct again in the future, they will have nothing to fear from such an Order. In view of the ruling by the Chairperson of the Tribunal, Mr. J. Grant Sinclair, referred to earlier in this Decision, this Order will not be issued until a final determination by the Courts of the constitutional question in the Lemire case.
 In regard to the other remedies sought by Mr. Warman, I have decided not to grant any relief under these provisions for the following reasons.
 During his cross-examination, Mr. Warman admitted (after initially denying) that he had participated in communicating messages on Internet Websites similar to the NorthernAlliance Website utilizing pseudonyms such as Pogue Mahone and Axetogrind.
 In one of several such communications that was entered into evidence during his cross-examination that Mr. Warman admitted having made, Mr. Warman using the name as Pogue Mahone Forum Member posted the following on the stormfront.org/forum Website on July 18, 2004: (The bolded words are Mr. Warman’s. The italicized words are a quote that he has included from a previous post made by a S88)
Re: Irwin Cotier (Jewish) as Minister of Justice in Canada
Originally Posted by S88
Did you know our minster of justice is jewish?
He has previously expressed a clear interest in the promotion of the interest in the promotion of the interests of Israel and the Jewish people, who represent a very small fraction of our nation’s population.
A recent announcement by your Federal government regarding a planned initiative to combat racism in response to recent anti-Semitic crimes is evidence of a misguided agenda. Such a plan will not only be a monumental waste of tax payer’s money, but will also lead Canada down the path towards Stalinist-style oppression.
Let’s look at the recent anti-Semitic crimes that have been used as an example for implementing this plan:
spray paint on Jewish houses and cars in Vaughan (backwards swastikas) – no arrests yet
spray paint in Toronto equating a star of David with a swastika – Iranian immigrant arrested.
Tomb stones overturned in a Jewish cemetery in Toronto – Jewish teenagers arrested and only charged with mischief
Fire in a Jewish school in Montreal – note left on scene blaming Jews for the murder of Palestinian Hamas spiritual leader
These incidents hardly seem like the rebirth of Kristallnacht, as Jewish leaders would have us believe. Jews themselves committed some of the vandalism and the rest was committed by Muslims, who are expressing the anger about events in the Middle East.
Spending much needed tax dollars on a scheme to further impose the will of Israel-firsters on Canadians is not what voters want.
With increasing immigration from third-world countries, old-world prejudices will continue to be expressed in Canada. If we really need to stop hate in Canada, then we need to look at ending immigration from third-world countries.
These information was taken from A Letter to Prime Minister of Canada
by Jason Ouwendyk..
Did you know we had an election and the new cabinet hasn’t been named yet? We still have scum in government but we have to wait and see which scum goes where.
 In another posting entered into evidence during his cross-examination and the authorship of which was admitted to by Mr. Warman, Mr. Warman as Axetogrind Junior Member posted the following on the VNN (Vanguard News Network) Forum on January 5, 2005.
Originally Posted by Thexder 3D
Is everything written there true?
I’m surprised those ADL Jews print quotes such as: Schoep, waving a noose, yelled to the crowd that he came to Kansas to speak the truth for my race, my people, my nation.
Certainly that’s something that might spark curiosity in (not yet racist) whites.
I agree. Keep up the good work Commander Schoep! 88
 Mr. Warman stated that the communications quoted in the previous two paragraphs did not cross the line into hate messaging nor did they provoke hate messages by others. He stated that the inclusion in his postings of possible hate messages from others were inadvertent slips by him in sending messages over the Internet. He further stated that his postings were intended to assist him in his quest for information about persons using the Internet to communicate discriminatory hate messages.
 I do not see any acceptable reason for Mr. Warman to have participated on the Stormfront or Vanguard sites, since there appears to be ample easily obtained messages on these sites available without his involvement. Moreover, it is possible that his activity in this regard, could have precipitated further hate messages in response. His explanation for including other hate messages in his postings by mistake seems very weak to me.
 Mr.Warman has, with the assistance of the Commission, instituted most of the s. 13 (1) complaints under the Act that have come before the Tribunal. He has been very successful in these cases and has garnered accolades for his work in this regard. The evidence in this case of his participation on Internet sites similar to the Northern Alliancesite is both disappointing and disturbing. It diminishes his credibility. For this reason and because the activities of the Respondents have ceased for a lengthy period of time, I will not make any further Orders in this matter.
In the real world, we would call such behaviour a “false flag.”
B’nai brith’s Anita Bromberg was quoted by the National Post as saying, “…It is borrowing on age-old canards that raise our concerns that this is designed to spread hate.” The Post doesn’t state which “canards” Mr. Topham was said to have quoted. Obviously, anybody who says “the jews” control Hollywood, the news media, finance, education and politics is a dirty rotten anti-simite who doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
Joel Stein, The Los Angeles Times, December 19, 2008
How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.
According to The National Post, “Police assumed sole responsibility for investigating hate crimes complaints about websites after the Conservatives voted in June to repeal a law that had previously allowed the rights commission to deal with such matters. “
Sadly, Mr. Topham’s orignal counsel, the legendary Doug Chistie, passed away. However, in an interview with WhatReallyHappened‘s Michael Rivero, one of Mr. Christie’s equally-capable associates has taken over.
Mr. Topham is being tried before a judge and jury. LettersToTheBeast wishes him all the best. A legal defense page has been set up for Arthur at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/. Cash and checks can be sent to: Arthur Topham, 4633 Barkerville Highway, Quesnel, British Columbia, V2J 6T8, Canada. Our American friends who are inclined to send Arthur a USPS money are reminded to specify an international money order to Canada as regular domestic postal money orders (identified as “negotiable only in the United States) are useless in Canada.
On a personal note, LettersToTheBeast would like to thank Mr. Warman for quantifying hate speech. And for clarifying that identifying the religious leanings of our rulers, and even referring to them as “israel-firsters” is permissible commentary.
Judge Butler has stated he will not rule on the constitutionality of the trial until its completion.
Let this kangaroo court show trial be the last hurrah for Richard Warman and his enablers and hangers-on.
And, Mr. Warman, when you stated, “Did you know we had an election and the new cabinet hasn’t been named yet? We still have scum in government but we have to wait and see which scum goes where,” LettersToTheBeast endorses that stance unconditionally.
For a gallery of LettersToTheBeast’s israel-firsters (thank you, Dick!) in Canadian politics, click here:
On October 10, 1990, a 15-year-old girl, then identified only as “Nayirah,” gave tearful testimony before the U.S. Congress She gave tearful testimony about how, during the Iraqi occupation of Kuwait, she had witnessed Iraqi soldiers storming the maternity ward at the hospital in which she claimed to be a volunteer. According to her tale, the soldiers removed babies from the incubators and left them on the “cold floor” (this is Kuwait, not Canada, keep in mind) to die. The Iraqi soldiers then supposedly removed the incubators. Presumably, taking them back to Iraq. It was a performance worthy of an Academy Award.
The tale took on a life of its own. It was repeated by other Kuwaiti officials. All of whom claimed to have personally witnessed exactly what this girl Nayirah witnessed.
The American public was outraged. As were people around the world. The brutality of the Saddam Hussein regime must be stopped at all cost. And the only way to accomplish that was for all free countries around the world (conveniently named “the allies” or “the coalition”), led by the United States, of course, to storm into Kuwait and re-take the place.
It was all a lie. “Nayirah” was, in fact, Nayirah al-Sabah, whose dad was the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States and Canada. Her entire story was concocted by public relations firm Hill and Knowlton and its creation, “Citizens for a Free Kuwait.” Citizens for a Free Kuwait was a rather strange-sounding name as Kuwait was not free before the then-sanctioned U.S. occupation (see April Glaspie), was not free during the occupation, and there was certainly no suggestion it would be free after a successful “liberation.”
The lead-up to al-Sabah’s testimony on October 10, 1990 goes back at least one-and-a-half months. On September 2, 1990, Kuwait’s U.N. Representative, Mohammad A. Abulhasan, wrote to Secretary-General Javier Perez de Cuellar, alleging brutality on the part of Iraqi troops as well as theft of state assets and hospital equipment, including incubators.
On September 5, the Kuwaiti health minister, Abdul Wahab Al-Fowzan, made similar allegations.
On September 9, National Public Radio claimed Iraqi solders had stormed a ward for premature infants, turned off the oxygen and removed the incubators.
On September 17, Edward Gnelm, the United States ambassador-designate to Kuwait (keep in mind, April Glaspie had been fired by this time) claimed 22 babies had died when Iraqi solders stole their incubators.
The Washington Post, which had previously reported it was unable to verify such claims, published a story on September 25 which accused Iraqi soldiers of removing babies and “stripping hospitals of incubators.”
Kuwait’s Emir, Sheik Jabbar al Ahmed al Sabah, complained to President George Herbert Walker Daddy Bush about stolen incubators, murders of babies and other Iraqi atrocities on September 29, 1990,
In its September 30, 1990 edition, U.S. News and World Report reported on the shocking brutality of Iraqi troops in Kuwait, including the removal of babies from incubators, leaving those babies to die of exposure (again, Kuwait), and the relocation of those incubators to Iraq.
On October 9, 1990, the day before Nayirah’s Big Day, President Bush stated at a news conference, “I thought General Scowcroft put it very well after the Amir left here. And I am very much concerned, not just about the physical dismantling but of the brutality that has now been written on by Amnesty International confirming some of the tales told us by the Amir of brutality. It’s just unbelievable, some of the things at least he reflected. I mean, people on a dialysis machine cut off, the machine sent to Baghdad; babies in incubators heaved out of the incubators and the incubators themselves sent to Baghdad. Now, I don’t know how many of these tales can be authenticated, but I do know that when the Amir was here he was speaking from the heart. And after that came Amnesty International, who were debriefing many of the people at the border. And it’s sickening.“
To his credit, at least Bush referred to those claims as “tales.”
Of course, we have been lied to many, many times since then. “Saddam’s Nukular Bombs” probably ranks even higher in notoriety than Nayirah’s tale for one basic reason: the claims were related to us by people who ought to have known better. Governments (chiefly the one located in the District of Criminals) are still lying to us. But the success rates of their various acts of deception are questionable. In 1990, we didn’t have a commercially-available internet. We didn’t have the means of independently verifying every single fact presented before us. We didn’t have a YouTube, which allowed public officials making outlandish claims to be exposed as habitual liars.
Newspapers and broadcast media organizations didn’t have comment sections. And now, they probably wish they didn’t. As commenters often use their own websites to call out Big Media lies.
Even in the lead up to Iraq II in 2003, the internet was still a relatively new novelty. Many of us had it, but we were mostly on dial-up. And most of those dial-up portals were controlled by America-On-Line. If you could get past the busy signal in the first place. So of course, in 2003, we bought “Weapons of Mass Destruction.” Hook. Line. And sinker.
Millions of people around the world have died because of Big Lies since Nayirah told her sorrowful tale 25 years ago. Bosnia. Serbia. Somalia. Sudan. Yemen. Afghanistan. Mali (yes, they even invaded Timbuktu). Libya. Syria. And occupied Palestine, whenever israel throws a temper tantrum. Thankfully, the brakes have been put on any thought of invading Iran. And the good people of Iran probably have their neighbours in Iraq to thank for their double-sacrifice in 1990 and 2003.
I’m sure there are people out there (one or two maybe) who would be thrilled to get a letter purporting to come from the office of the prime minister. I am not one of them. As indicated by the “admail” stamp, and the return address of the Conservative Party of Canada, this is clearly a fundraising appeal from Steve.
I’m not sure when it was that I gave up on the Conservative Party. Was it when Deborah Grey turned her back on her fellow Reform members who got her there and stuck her fat nose in the parliamentary “pension” trough? Or was it when the former signatory of Conservative fundraising letters Irving Gerstein ended up in the senate?
I’m not even sure how these bastards got my home address because I sure as hell didn’t keep their membership department updated. And when I wrote to the beasts, I used my P.O. box as my return address.
What an ingenious bunch these neocons are.
I’m voting NDP this time around. And if by some miracle: a) they are elected and; b) they don’t screw things up, I just might vote for them again next election.
On the other hand, if and when the Conservative Party redeems itself and chooses for itself a leader who is worth of being called a libertarian conservative (not a new world order fascist), and someone who is completely removed from not only the current regime but the larger new world order agenda, I’ll be back. Until then, I don’t want to hear from these sons of bitches.
As for the envelope, I didn’t open it. I’m putting it back in the mail box.