Category Archives: banksters

Canadian banks’ credit ratings downgraded as the regime drags its heels on rules that would allow them to steal depositors’ money.

BRICS leaders
The five people who keep banksters up at night.


It was only a few years ago that suggestions that banks – along with pliant governments – were plotting to steal our money and that we ought to be buying up gold and silver and taking physical delivery were ridiculed as tin-foil hat conspiracy theories.

They’re not talking about black helicopters in Cyprus these days.


Moody’s revises outlook on Canadian bank system downward

July 10, 2014

Mr. Joseph Oliver

House of Commons

Ottawa, Ontario

K1A 0A5

Dear Mr. Oliver:

This past week, the State Broadcaster reported that Moody’s (the same outfit that rated half-million-dollar mortgages held by waitresses in Los Angeles making $250,000 annually as “triple-A”) expressed its concern over the fact that your regime has been dragging its (your) heels in implementing a “bail-in” scheme to back-stop Canadian banks’ fraudulent conduct.

When banks engage in fraud worldwide, it is not the responsibility of the taxpayers of sovereign nations to “bail them out.” Even if those banks print up money, loan it to governments at interest, who then give it to banks gratis to compensate banks for the losses due to their fraud.

Only one country – Iceland – not only said “no” to the banksters but imprisoned them as well. After a change in government, of course.

While putting on the public pretence that setting up a process for the Canadian banks to confiscate our wealth is a road that even you are not willing to go down is at least encouraging, I must also not forget that your regime consists of psychopathic liars.

“Our assumption has always been that the Canadian government would be very willing to support the major Canadian banks in the interest of economic stability and ensuring that the payment system operates correctly under times of stress,” Moody’s Canadian financial analyst David Beattie told Reuters.

My response to Mr. Beattie is: “Hell, no!” And theft of my money to perpetuate continued fraud is NOT economic stability. “Under times of stress…” That would be when the federal reserve ponzi scheme collapses, I presume?

If the Canadian banks are so hard up for cash, tell them to go cap-in-hand to the Rothschilds or the Rockefellers but leave taxpayers and depositors out of it. Depositors are NOT investors. They are secured creditors.

In ancient history, when claim-check holders found their gold missing from the vault, they apprehended the banksters and hanged them from the nearest tree.

Here’s another gem from Mr. Beattie:

Beattie said that the chance of an event that would require a bail-in to be activated is “extremely remote, in the low single digits probability.”

Right. Just like Alan Greenspan and the entire Federal Reserve board (save one member) dismissed the very possibility of a decline in the real estate market in 2007.

I am pleased to report, Mr. Oliver, that whatever scheme you and your bankster friends are cooking up, I am immune. I have taken precautions to protect myself and my family. Obviously, I am not going to elaborate on those efforts. However, I will tell you that I deal with a credit union, not a bank. And I only keep enough in that credit union to meet my obligations.

As nations such as Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa conclude they don’t need the dollar to conduct trade amongst themselves, and bring along their trading partners to that way of thinking, I would suggest to you that efforts by the banksters to preserve their fraud will become increasingly frantic.

When the ponzi does collapse, I’m not sure what the banksters will do when Americans start asking themselves: If we called our congress critters and told them 99:1 ‘NO BAILOUT!’ how are we possibly liable for $13-trillion, or $30-trillion or however much the fraud ends up being exposed as (A hundred? Do I hear one hundred…)?

Losses due to bank fraud are not my problem. Even if those losses are passed on to taxpayers. However, as a taxpayer, I will be more than happy to fund as many double-bunked prison cells as is necessary to house these maggots for the rest of their unnatural lives. Although, as a cost-saving measure, whatever new government we end up with during reconstruction may lean towards building gallows with multiple trapdoors for quicker service.

China executes crooked banksters. So does Vietnam. So does Iran. Meanwhile, here in Canada, the U.S.S.A. and Europe we act as if they own us.

I don’t recognize your legitimacy. And I won’t pay.

P.S.: How much did the Bank of Canada give The Big Six in bailout candy in 2008? Seventy-five billion? 100? More? And why is the Bank obstructing Freedom of Information requests six years on?


While The Apartheid State continues its war crimes unchallenged, Alex Jones opens with “Michelle Obama is a tranny.”

“Gentlemen! I too have been a close observer of the doings of the Bank of the United States. I have had men watching you for a long time, and am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I have determined to rout you out, and by the Eternal, (bringing his fist down on the table) I will rout you out!” 
—Andrew Jackson
Izl War Crimes 1Izl War Crimes 2Izl War Crimes 3Izl War Crimes 4Izl War Crimes 5
The only reason The Apartheid State is able to get away with atrocities normally attributed to circa-1940s Germany is because our governments (worldwide), financial, educational, media and entertainment institutions have been subverted. When allegations of human rights abuses in countries like Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc.,are made F-18s are promptly dispatched to bring freedom and democracy to the long suffering people.
But when The Apartheid State engages in horrors worse than what popular narratives tell us occurred seventy years ago, the answer is for politicians to stuff even more money – money stolen from us and our great, great, great, not-even-born-yet grandchildren – into those trans-Atlantic pneumatic tubes running from Ottawa, Washington and London and landing on the floor of the Knesset. And the bullshit media runs interference while they do it.
Are you guys friggin’ kidding me?
I’m listening for a few hours on my blu-ray until Mike Rivero comes on over at RBN because a) I am bored and b) you folks do broadcast a nugget of truth. But Michelle Obama? Tranny?
No, let’s not talk about atrocities and war crimes in The Apartheid State. Funny how that happens quite a bit around there, isn’t it? This is exactly why I stopped sending money to A.J, stopped buying his merchandise and stopped doing business with Midas. I don’t remember the exact date, but it was three or four years ago. Around the same time you people banned any of my comments which put A.J.’s Apartheid State masters in a less than stellar light.
My complaint with Jones is not so much what he does broadcast, but what he leaves out. And what he does broadcast is discredited when he has kooks like Icke on. Jones is right. We have been subverted. We have been conquered. We have been looted. We do need to fight back. Whether it’s on the advice of his wife or his Bronfman lawyer, I’m not sure, but Jones conveniently leaves out who we have to fight back against. Hint (in no particular order): Alan Greenspan. Paul Volcker. Ben Bernanke. Tim Geithner. Jamie Dimon. Lloyd Blankfein. Janet Yellen. Mark Carney. Edgar Bronfman. George Soros. Henry Kissinger.  Rahm (He’s Not Washing The White House Floors Like An Arab) Emmanuel. Yeah, you think we might have a goddman problem somewhere here?
Since Jones claims to be such a big fan of George Washington, maybe he should do an expanded segment about how Washington and the other founding fathers were determined to keep the banksters of their day out of the United States of America. At any cost.
Apologists for the banksters sneer that when Andrew Jackson gave his Den of Vipers speech, it was blatant anti-semitism. Thus anyone who quotes that speech today is equally “anti-semitic.” If Jackson was, indeed, referring to the descendants of the ancient Khassars. then he was one hundred per cent bang on correct then, as would he be today.(Not sure how that relates to the semites, though since they have absolutely nothing to do with the Khassars).
But since A.J. said “his” operation costs over $500,000 a month, it’s not as if you need my support or business anyway. Besides, when StratFor’s got Jones’s back. my sending my little PayPal pittance is like sending coal to Newcastle.
I am utterly disappointed that Mike is moving back to G.C.N. But as I told him, he knows what’s best for him and his program. Not me.
I will continue to support R.B.N. and I will continue to support WhatReallyHappened.
But I will de damned if I will send another dime to Infowars.
Oh, by the way, have you noticed the bullshit media is doing shark attacks again? Just like they were doing, exactly 13 summers ago? I wonder if the next one will have Apartheid State nationals dancing in the streets of Newark just like that last one?