Canada’s israeli community was determined to make an example of Arthur Topham. And it did.
The Canadian jewish News of November 18 bent over backwards to congratulate itself on the successful persecution of RadicalPress.com’s Arthur Topham.
Harry Abrams, 63, a Victoria-based owner of an advertising company, was among the first to bring attention to Topham’s website and his anti-Semitic vitriol back in 2007. Abrams, who has 30 years of anti-defamation work behind him and currently leads the Jewish Federation of Victoria and Vancouver Island’s social action committee, describes Topham as “rabidly anti-Semitic.”
Curiously, the CjN mentions who was “among the first,” but fails to mention any other complainants. Like the Mysterious Stranger, Richard Warman’s role in this victory goes unnoticed. Warman is the serial SLAPP-suiter responsible for most of the now-defunct Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. Warman was cited by the CHRT in 2009 for engaging in provacateuring activity by posting his own “hate messages” on targeted cites and then turning around and filing complaints with the Tribunal because those websites posted his comments in the first place. The CHRT sanctioned Warman by, in the case of Northern Alliance, not allowing him to collect a piece of the action (a portion of the $10,000 fine) as had been customary in his previous cases.
Arthur Topham is forbidden by court order from discussing who the two initial complainants were.
When interviewed by the Canadian jewish News, pliant now-former Royal Canadian Mounted Police worker Terry Wilson (age 51 and retired…nice), who was instrumental in getting the job done for the b’nai brith despite the odds, couldn’t pass up the chance to not only kick Arthur when he was down, but also trash his wife of nearly four decades, Shastah.
Topham also claimed that his wife Shastah is Jewish, a fact Wilson disputes. “He could say she was Jewish by birth but there was no way she would be Jewish by religion and stick with a guy who said things like that.”
A cop speaking his mind about a heinous criminal such as Arthur Topham is one thing. But going after the man’s wife of 37 years for “sticking around with him” is absolutely beyond the pale. Wilson ought to be ashamed of himself. His colleagues in the Police Community should be outraged.
The public face of the prosecution, Harry Abrams, was so elated he couldn’t contain himself when he commented on his own role in the CjN’s reportage.
Actually, Harry, if another website decides to mirror or reproduce Arthur’s writings, there is absolutely no legal consequence to Arthur himself. The only legal consequence would be to the reproducing website itself. And only if Arthur decided to sue for copyright infringement.
There have been spectacular “holocaust denier” trials in Canada in the past. Jim Keegstra, a schoolteacher who was ultimately convicted of “spreading hate against an identifiable group” for teaching his pupils alternative views of World War II history. Keegstra’s conviction was overturned on appeal and subsequently re-instated by the Supreme Court of Canada.
And then of course, there was Ernst Zundel. Zundel was charged under Canada’s criminal code for publishing (he wasn’t even the author; he merely owned the printing plant) a pamphlet entitled “Did Six Million Really Die?” Zundel was charged “spreading false news.”
Canada’s corporate media, the CjN included, were clearly hoping happy days were here again with Arthur Topham. It didn’t happen. They reported he had been charged three years ago (again, based on the complaints of Abrams and Warman). They reported the start of Arthur’s trial. They reported his conviction. But nothing in between. There was no show trial. No circus. No construction hard hats.
LettersToTheBeast is pleased to report Arthur’s website, RadicalPresss.com, is still up an running despite the efforts of the government.
On Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 11:27 a.m. in the British Columbia Supreme Court, city of Quesnel, I was pronounced “Guilty” by a jury of twelve men and women of the following criminal offence, also known as Count 1:
“Roy Arthur TOPHAM, between the 28th day of April, 2011 and the 4th day of May, 2012, inclusive, at or near Quesnel, in the Province of British Columbia, did by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code.”
Immediately following I was pronounced “Not Guilty” of a second and identical criminal offence, known as Count 2:
“Roy Arthur TOPHAM, between the 29th day of January, 2013 and the 11th day of December, 2013, inclusive, at or near Quesnel, in the Province of British Columbia, did by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code.”
Within moments of the jury leaving the courtroom Crown prosecutor Jennifer Johnson was seeking new bail conditions that would restrict even further my fundamental rights as contained in Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Defence Attorney Barclay Johnson immediately objected suggesting to Justice Bruce Butler that if Crown wants changes to my bail conditions then due process should be followed and Crown must file an application to that effect. Justice Butler agreed and the date of Thursday, November 19, 2015 was set for a hearing on Crown’s application. Later it was set for Friday, November 20th, 2015 at 10 a.m.
Given the fact that Crown has attempted on two earlier occasions to have stringent bail conditions imposed upon my freedom to operate RadicalPress.com it must be assumed that in this instance too Crown will be calling for either removal of my site from the Internet or else a total ban on my ability to operate it until final sentencing which is tentatively scheduled for late January of 2016.
In the event that Crown is able to accomplish either of its objectives, November 20th, 2015 could, theoretically, be the last day that I am able to communicate the status of my case on the Internet pending the outcome of my Charter challenge to Sec. 319(2).
LettersToTheBeast would also like to take the liberty of reprinting a few paragraphs of Arthur’s comments, should RadicalPress become Orwellized by the Canadian government:
Our collective dilemma
Only someone in a comatose condition or willfully blind to any form of self-reflection could deny the fact that the global state of affairs today has reached an extreme state of critical disharmony.
War, and the threat of war, environmental degradation, cancer rates of epic proportions, fear levels at an all-time high and an endless array of bureaucratic and media machinations all designed to confuse and obfuscate any remedial efforts on the part of the people to rectify this imminent threat to our collective condition are the order of the day. Then, coupled with all of these Orwellian conditions, is the growing threat by Zionist infiltrated nation states to introduce illogical, totalitarian, communist tactics such as “hate crime” legislation in order to penalize those who attempt to define and interpret the present narrative of negativity.
Numerous individual writers from the past have warned us repeatedly of what would happen if we didn’t get off our collective fanny and do something about what was happening but, as is the human condition, the general populace is too busy making a living, paying off their plastic, raising families and mesmerized by Big Brother’s “Eye” tv to find the time to address and dismantle these specious, serpentine moves of the Zionist lobbyist to put in place their anti-free speech “hate” legislation.
Now that the proverbial fecal matter is hitting the fan suddenly the truth revealers are getting broad-sided by this legislation and falsely accused and dragged before Stalinist “Show Trial”courts in order to plug the failing dams of deception that are currently crumbling before their very eyes.
In term of my own situation I’ve spent a lifetime searching for answers to this perennial problem of endless conflict and environmental destruction and now, at the ripe young age of 68, I can honestly and rightfully declare that all of my years of research and writing, coupled with the past 9 years of ‘harrowing’ legal hassles, only further corroborates and confirms that censorship of individuals who earnestly try to give warning to their fellow citizens and censorship of the Internet via the unscrupulous use of “hate crime” legislation must be stopped if we are to remain free to think, reason and peacefully protest against any form of oppression.
The final step in this ongoing process of ridding our country of the last remaining legal barrier (Sec. 319(2) of the criminal code will be a Constitutional challenge using the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Sec. 2b which states:
Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
Israel and the Zionist agenda
All of the hate crime legislation in the world has been created by one group, the Zionist Jew lobby, working through B’nai Brith International and other similar orgs. They’ve set themselves up in every nation of the West and their primary purpose as agents of the state of Israel is to silence any and all criticism of the Zionist ideology and its debilitating effect upon human rights and freedom of expression. This fact is now beyond dispute and case after case where individuals are charged with these duplicitous “hate” crimes the complainants inevitably are dual citizens of the foreign state of Israel or else goy sycophants in the pay of these same lobbyists.
To support Israel is to support racism, apartheid, murder of innocents, theft of other nation’s land, the destruction of other cultures, war, destruction and endless terrorist acts and media deception on a scale never before witnessed in human history.
Any Western government that “stands with Israel” is admitting to and condoning and complicit with all of these barbaric and uncivilized actions that comprise the whole of what political Zionism entails.
My first duty as a human being is to acknowledge, revere and do the Will of the Creator – source of all life. God = Love = Truth. If I don’t include God in every equation related to my work and my life then it all becomes meaningless and devoid of that one fundamental principle which governs both the physical and spiritual realms. Any attempt at addressing the evils that men do which omits the Truth is futile. God gave man Free Will which ultimately implies the right to express himself without fear of state repression. The atheistic Zionist agenda would end that freedom of the mind and soul and for that reason alone it must be resisted all costs.
My purpose in all that I’ve done over my lifetime has been to shed light upon the machinations of those who would enslave us and silence us so that we’re not at liberty to express our thoughts and ideas. Censorship now remains the #1 threat to our global survival in that without the freedom to challenge the state (any state) and its dictates and demands we’re left bereft of the ability to speak the Truth. In this sense my struggle is every person’s struggle who desires to remain free and live in peace and harmony with their fellow human beings and all other life forms.
LettersToTheBeast continues to wish Arthur Topham and RadicalPress well. Arthur could have easily been cowed by the two notorious miscreants Abrams and Warman as well as b’nai brith. But he wasn’t. He made them work for their single conviction. And he brought attention to the outrageous and unconscionable control these people and organaization have over our public institutions. Arthur knew from the outset that going up against the likes of b’nai brith, its agents and its well-financed and influential backers would be like fighting Satan in a house fire. Or an oil refinery. (LettersToTheBeasts thanks two anonymous commenters in an Infowars story regarding Alex Jones’ divorce battle with his ex-wife Kelly for those analogies).
Arthur Topham’s sacrifice also brings up the right to and the need for anonymity. They are just as relevant today in the on-line universe as they were when Johanes Gutenberg re-invented the movable-type printing press nearly six centuries ago. Arthur wrote these articles and opinion pieces and published them under his own name. And now he’s paying the price.
This is a topic LettersToTheBeast will cover at a later time.
Please continue to support Arthur Topham by taking the largest currency note you have in your wallet and mailing it him at: 4633 Barkerville Highway, Quesnel, British Columbia, V2J 6T8, Canada.
I couldn’t help but notice that, beyond last week’s blurb on CBC.ca/news the fact that Arthur Topham’s trial was getting under way in Quesnel, B.C., there has been complete silence from the b.s. media (CBC included).
I don’t suppose it’s possible there are some very uncomfortable subjects being discussed in that court room that you would rather not reach the outside world, lest the masses get ideas in their little heads?
Is it possible that Topham is on trial for engaging in legitimate criticism of a foreign government? Accurately quoting religious mythology? Is it possible the government, prodded along by known provacateur and SLAPP-suiter Richard Warman (in addition to Harry Abrams) is carrying out a show trial?
Is it possible that Mr. Topham is not coming off as a nutjob like Ernst Zundel did (yes, I’m old enough to remember that circus). Is it possible that Mr. Topham is coming to court in a suit and tie, and is leaving his hard-hat at home?
I sure would have liked to have known what Gilad Atzmon had to say? Or is it the fact Atzmon was testifying for THE DEFENSE the problem?
So, what is it? If you are going to report a trial is under way, I want to know what is going on in that trial. That’s what I pay you for.
Feel free to respond to me by e-mail. Or at my own website, LettersToTheBeast, where you can find a copy of this letter.
There is nothing more dangerous than a cornered animal.
The government of israel has, in the past year, seen its authority around the planet challenged. When israel says, “jump,” the current president of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, is not asking, “how high?”
For a host of reasons, Canadians have thrown their Likudnik “Conservative” government out of office. Of course, it remains to be seen whether the new boss, Justin Trudeau, will be the same as the old boss, Stephen “Steve” Harper.
Benjamin Netanyahu’s behaviour has grown increasingly erratic and unpredictable since he channeled Wyle E. Coyote in front of the United Nations three years ago. Recently, Bibi became a holocaust revisionist when he claimed Haj Amin al-Husseini, Jerusalem’s Grand Mufti in 1941, suggested to Adolph Hitler “exterminate” all Jewish people in Germany, rather than merely relocate them to Palestine, as was Hitler’s inclination at the time (according to Netanyahu). Of course , besides challenging the orthodox historical narrative regarding wartime German history, Netanyahu’s claims fly in the face of israeli doctrine which states there was never any such place as “Palestine.” Not today. Not ever.
Never-ending wars in Syria, Iraq, Libya and Yemen (among other places) have caused a humanitarian crisis as swarms of Muslim refugees arrive in Europe. As they assimilate into their new countries, they are unlikely to be particularly sympathetic towards Europe’s traditional ruling class and are likely to take issue with historical narratives. Particularly in Germany. http://www.timesofisrael.com/german-jews-fear-backlash-from-countrys-welcome-of-refugees/ Talk about not thinking things through.
Arthur Topham, the webmaster behind The Radical Press (www.RadicalPress.com) is the latest victim of israel’s wrath this out for himself as he goes on trial for “hate speech.”
Mr. Topham was originally charged in November, 2012. According to Toronto’s National Post newspaper of November 6, 2012 (Stewart Bell, reporter) http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/b-c-man-charged-with-promoting-hatred-against-jews-on-website, the charges were instigated by Harry Abrams, a b’nai brith “volunteer” and serial SLAPP-suiter Richard Warman. B’nai brith is the branch office of the anti-defamantion league (adl) in Canada. And Warman has a storied history at now-defunct Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.
During its existence, Warman would regularly file complaints with the CHRT, seek large fines against purported offenders, and arrange for a portion of those fines to be directed towards himself. Warman’s behaviour can be confirmed by visiting the website of the CHRT (http://www.chrt-tcdp.gc.ca/NS/index-eng.asp) and searching “Warman.”
Warman was found to have joined “white supremacist” websites and posted inflammatory material from the point of view of a “white supremacist.” The decision runs over 20 pages, however, you may get to the good part by searching the word “admitted.”
The following is an except from the decision (bold text is LettersToTheBeast’s).
 The purpose of a Cease and Desist Order under s. 54 (1) (a) of the Act is to both remediate conduct found to be contrary to s. 13 (1) of the Act and to send a message to others that such conduct is not acceptable. In the present case, the Northern AllianceWebsite is no longer in existence as it was apparently sold to an unrelated party several years ago. Contrary to Mr. Warman’s Statement of Particulars, there is no evidence that the impugned conduct by the Respondents has continued to the present time. Instead it appears to have been discontinued well before the complaints were instituted. To a certain extent, there would not appear to be anything to remediate. However, one has no way of knowing whether the cessation of activity by the Respondents was related to a genuine understanding by the Respondents that their prior conduct was discriminatory and a firm resolve that it would not be repeated at any time in the future. To be on the safe side, therefore, I will make an Order along the lines requested by Mr. Warman under s. 54 (1) (a) of the Act. If the Respondents do not engage in the impugned conduct again in the future, they will have nothing to fear from such an Order. In view of the ruling by the Chairperson of the Tribunal, Mr. J. Grant Sinclair, referred to earlier in this Decision, this Order will not be issued until a final determination by the Courts of the constitutional question in the Lemire case.
 In regard to the other remedies sought by Mr. Warman, I have decided not to grant any relief under these provisions for the following reasons.
 During his cross-examination, Mr. Warman admitted (after initially denying) that he had participated in communicating messages on Internet Websites similar to the NorthernAlliance Website utilizing pseudonyms such as Pogue Mahone and Axetogrind.
 In one of several such communications that was entered into evidence during his cross-examination that Mr. Warman admitted having made, Mr. Warman using the name as Pogue Mahone Forum Member posted the following on the stormfront.org/forum Website on July 18, 2004: (The bolded words are Mr. Warman’s. The italicized words are a quote that he has included from a previous post made by a S88)
Re: Irwin Cotier (Jewish) as Minister of Justice in Canada
Originally Posted by S88
Did you know our minster of justice is jewish?
He has previously expressed a clear interest in the promotion of the interest in the promotion of the interests of Israel and the Jewish people, who represent a very small fraction of our nation’s population.
A recent announcement by your Federal government regarding a planned initiative to combat racism in response to recent anti-Semitic crimes is evidence of a misguided agenda. Such a plan will not only be a monumental waste of tax payer’s money, but will also lead Canada down the path towards Stalinist-style oppression.
Let’s look at the recent anti-Semitic crimes that have been used as an example for implementing this plan:
spray paint on Jewish houses and cars in Vaughan (backwards swastikas) – no arrests yet
spray paint in Toronto equating a star of David with a swastika – Iranian immigrant arrested.
Tomb stones overturned in a Jewish cemetery in Toronto – Jewish teenagers arrested and only charged with mischief
Fire in a Jewish school in Montreal – note left on scene blaming Jews for the murder of Palestinian Hamas spiritual leader
These incidents hardly seem like the rebirth of Kristallnacht, as Jewish leaders would have us believe. Jews themselves committed some of the vandalism and the rest was committed by Muslims, who are expressing the anger about events in the Middle East.
Spending much needed tax dollars on a scheme to further impose the will of Israel-firsters on Canadians is not what voters want.
With increasing immigration from third-world countries, old-world prejudices will continue to be expressed in Canada. If we really need to stop hate in Canada, then we need to look at ending immigration from third-world countries.
These information was taken from A Letter to Prime Minister of Canada
by Jason Ouwendyk..
Did you know we had an election and the new cabinet hasn’t been named yet? We still have scum in government but we have to wait and see which scum goes where.
 In another posting entered into evidence during his cross-examination and the authorship of which was admitted to by Mr. Warman, Mr. Warman as Axetogrind Junior Member posted the following on the VNN (Vanguard News Network) Forum on January 5, 2005.
Originally Posted by Thexder 3D
Is everything written there true?
I’m surprised those ADL Jews print quotes such as: Schoep, waving a noose, yelled to the crowd that he came to Kansas to speak the truth for my race, my people, my nation.
Certainly that’s something that might spark curiosity in (not yet racist) whites.
I agree. Keep up the good work Commander Schoep! 88
 Mr. Warman stated that the communications quoted in the previous two paragraphs did not cross the line into hate messaging nor did they provoke hate messages by others. He stated that the inclusion in his postings of possible hate messages from others were inadvertent slips by him in sending messages over the Internet. He further stated that his postings were intended to assist him in his quest for information about persons using the Internet to communicate discriminatory hate messages.
 I do not see any acceptable reason for Mr. Warman to have participated on the Stormfront or Vanguard sites, since there appears to be ample easily obtained messages on these sites available without his involvement. Moreover, it is possible that his activity in this regard, could have precipitated further hate messages in response. His explanation for including other hate messages in his postings by mistake seems very weak to me.
 Mr.Warman has, with the assistance of the Commission, instituted most of the s. 13 (1) complaints under the Act that have come before the Tribunal. He has been very successful in these cases and has garnered accolades for his work in this regard. The evidence in this case of his participation on Internet sites similar to the Northern Alliancesite is both disappointing and disturbing. It diminishes his credibility. For this reason and because the activities of the Respondents have ceased for a lengthy period of time, I will not make any further Orders in this matter.
In the real world, we would call such behaviour a “false flag.”
B’nai brith’s Anita Bromberg was quoted by the National Post as saying, “…It is borrowing on age-old canards that raise our concerns that this is designed to spread hate.” The Post doesn’t state which “canards” Mr. Topham was said to have quoted. Obviously, anybody who says “the jews” control Hollywood, the news media, finance, education and politics is a dirty rotten anti-simite who doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
Joel Stein, The Los Angeles Times, December 19, 2008
How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.
According to The National Post, “Police assumed sole responsibility for investigating hate crimes complaints about websites after the Conservatives voted in June to repeal a law that had previously allowed the rights commission to deal with such matters. “
Sadly, Mr. Topham’s orignal counsel, the legendary Doug Chistie, passed away. However, in an interview with WhatReallyHappened‘s Michael Rivero, one of Mr. Christie’s equally-capable associates has taken over.
Mr. Topham is being tried before a judge and jury. LettersToTheBeast wishes him all the best. A legal defense page has been set up for Arthur at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/. Cash and checks can be sent to: Arthur Topham, 4633 Barkerville Highway, Quesnel, British Columbia, V2J 6T8, Canada. Our American friends who are inclined to send Arthur a USPS money are reminded to specify an international money order to Canada as regular domestic postal money orders (identified as “negotiable only in the United States) are useless in Canada.
On a personal note, LettersToTheBeast would like to thank Mr. Warman for quantifying hate speech. And for clarifying that identifying the religious leanings of our rulers, and even referring to them as “israel-firsters” is permissible commentary.
Judge Butler has stated he will not rule on the constitutionality of the trial until its completion.
Let this kangaroo court show trial be the last hurrah for Richard Warman and his enablers and hangers-on.
And, Mr. Warman, when you stated, “Did you know we had an election and the new cabinet hasn’t been named yet? We still have scum in government but we have to wait and see which scum goes where,” LettersToTheBeast endorses that stance unconditionally.
For a gallery of LettersToTheBeast’s israel-firsters (thank you, Dick!) in Canadian politics, click here:
On October 10, 1990, a 15-year-old girl, then identified only as “Nayirah,” gave tearful testimony before the U.S. Congress She gave tearful testimony about how, during the Iraqi occupation of Kuwait, she had witnessed Iraqi soldiers storming the maternity ward at the hospital in which she claimed to be a volunteer. According to her tale, the soldiers removed babies from the incubators and left them on the “cold floor” (this is Kuwait, not Canada, keep in mind) to die. The Iraqi soldiers then supposedly removed the incubators. Presumably, taking them back to Iraq. It was a performance worthy of an Academy Award.
The tale took on a life of its own. It was repeated by other Kuwaiti officials. All of whom claimed to have personally witnessed exactly what this girl Nayirah witnessed.
The American public was outraged. As were people around the world. The brutality of the Saddam Hussein regime must be stopped at all cost. And the only way to accomplish that was for all free countries around the world (conveniently named “the allies” or “the coalition”), led by the United States, of course, to storm into Kuwait and re-take the place.
It was all a lie. “Nayirah” was, in fact, Nayirah al-Sabah, whose dad was the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States and Canada. Her entire story was concocted by public relations firm Hill and Knowlton and its creation, “Citizens for a Free Kuwait.” Citizens for a Free Kuwait was a rather strange-sounding name as Kuwait was not free before the then-sanctioned U.S. occupation (see April Glaspie), was not free during the occupation, and there was certainly no suggestion it would be free after a successful “liberation.”
The lead-up to al-Sabah’s testimony on October 10, 1990 goes back at least one-and-a-half months. On September 2, 1990, Kuwait’s U.N. Representative, Mohammad A. Abulhasan, wrote to Secretary-General Javier Perez de Cuellar, alleging brutality on the part of Iraqi troops as well as theft of state assets and hospital equipment, including incubators.
On September 5, the Kuwaiti health minister, Abdul Wahab Al-Fowzan, made similar allegations.
On September 9, National Public Radio claimed Iraqi solders had stormed a ward for premature infants, turned off the oxygen and removed the incubators.
On September 17, Edward Gnelm, the United States ambassador-designate to Kuwait (keep in mind, April Glaspie had been fired by this time) claimed 22 babies had died when Iraqi solders stole their incubators.
The Washington Post, which had previously reported it was unable to verify such claims, published a story on September 25 which accused Iraqi soldiers of removing babies and “stripping hospitals of incubators.”
Kuwait’s Emir, Sheik Jabbar al Ahmed al Sabah, complained to President George Herbert Walker Daddy Bush about stolen incubators, murders of babies and other Iraqi atrocities on September 29, 1990,
In its September 30, 1990 edition, U.S. News and World Report reported on the shocking brutality of Iraqi troops in Kuwait, including the removal of babies from incubators, leaving those babies to die of exposure (again, Kuwait), and the relocation of those incubators to Iraq.
On October 9, 1990, the day before Nayirah’s Big Day, President Bush stated at a news conference, “I thought General Scowcroft put it very well after the Amir left here. And I am very much concerned, not just about the physical dismantling but of the brutality that has now been written on by Amnesty International confirming some of the tales told us by the Amir of brutality. It’s just unbelievable, some of the things at least he reflected. I mean, people on a dialysis machine cut off, the machine sent to Baghdad; babies in incubators heaved out of the incubators and the incubators themselves sent to Baghdad. Now, I don’t know how many of these tales can be authenticated, but I do know that when the Amir was here he was speaking from the heart. And after that came Amnesty International, who were debriefing many of the people at the border. And it’s sickening.“
To his credit, at least Bush referred to those claims as “tales.”
Of course, we have been lied to many, many times since then. “Saddam’s Nukular Bombs” probably ranks even higher in notoriety than Nayirah’s tale for one basic reason: the claims were related to us by people who ought to have known better. Governments (chiefly the one located in the District of Criminals) are still lying to us. But the success rates of their various acts of deception are questionable. In 1990, we didn’t have a commercially-available internet. We didn’t have the means of independently verifying every single fact presented before us. We didn’t have a YouTube, which allowed public officials making outlandish claims to be exposed as habitual liars.
Newspapers and broadcast media organizations didn’t have comment sections. And now, they probably wish they didn’t. As commenters often use their own websites to call out Big Media lies.
Even in the lead up to Iraq II in 2003, the internet was still a relatively new novelty. Many of us had it, but we were mostly on dial-up. And most of those dial-up portals were controlled by America-On-Line. If you could get past the busy signal in the first place. So of course, in 2003, we bought “Weapons of Mass Destruction.” Hook. Line. And sinker.
Millions of people around the world have died because of Big Lies since Nayirah told her sorrowful tale 25 years ago. Bosnia. Serbia. Somalia. Sudan. Yemen. Afghanistan. Mali (yes, they even invaded Timbuktu). Libya. Syria. And occupied Palestine, whenever israel throws a temper tantrum. Thankfully, the brakes have been put on any thought of invading Iran. And the good people of Iran probably have their neighbours in Iraq to thank for their double-sacrifice in 1990 and 2003.
I am writing to first congratulate your party on your provincial colleagues’ win in Alberta last month. I am also writing to tell you that, as a conservative, I will be taking a huge chance and voting for your party federally in the next general election. Clearly the good people of Alberta feel as I do.
I am hopeful that your party can find a candidate here in Niagara Falls that can pull off a win as impressive as Wayne Gates did in the past provincial general election and by-election.
Yours was the only party who opposed the “anti-terrorism” legislation, bill C-51. And you, personally, were the only politician in the country who had the courage to point out certain questions with regards to the purported death of USAma bin-Laden.
While I realize an NDP government would have certain loyalties and agendas to implement, I would ask that a Mulcair administration:
End Canadian participation in the U.S. War of Terror and “war on drugs.”
Repeal all Harper regime legislation which seeks to implement a police state
Restore constitutional freedoms
End unconditional support for the government of israel, stop all foreign aid to that government and cease enabling its war crimes
introduce legislation to elect senators in the long term. And in the short term, do not appoint any senators under the age of 70.
Pardon all Canadians convicted of victimless (i.e. drug possession) crimes, and release those currently caged.
Repeal Canada – U.S. – “border security” arrangements which seek to allow U.S. Police agents to operate and be armed in our country.
Eliminate the parliamentary “pension plan” for current members of parliament and investigate repudiating past obligations.
Order the RCMP to open an impartial investigation into criminal code offenses and War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity offenses committed by members of the Harper regime and appoint a special prosecutor.
To be clear, I oppose many of the policies of the NDP. As a resident of Ontario throughout the Bob Rae government of the 1990s, you can understand why. I abhor big government, even bigger taxation, a cradle-to-grave nanny-state and gun-grabbing. I am under no illusion that you and I will see eye-to-eye on those matters. However, even Bob Rae surprised us. Unfortunately, it was too late by then.
I am certain, however, that if you want to implement your socialist agenda, you have to give Canadians the tools make the money in order to pay the taxes to do so. First and foremost, we need the banksters thrown off of parliament hill. We need the Bank of Canada – if not abolished – to at least work for Canadians. We can accomplish that by ordering the Bank to return to its original purpose of issuing credit to the government of Canada at zero interest. And issuing our public currency at no cost. As it stands now, every “dollar” issued by the Bank of Canada is a loan at interest.
We can also agree that paying interest on debt is a waste of money that could better be used for good of Canadians. Paul Martin had us on the road to paying off our debt. Our country needs to be debt-free while it is still mathematically possible. Canadians need to understand that banks thrive on debt – both consumer and public. Nothing will bring the banksters to heel quite like becoming debt-free. Just make sure you are wearing your Kevlar underpants because the Rothschilds and the “federal” “reserve” won’t be happy with you (see Iraq, Libya, Iran and Syria for examples of their displeasure).
We need a government that will repudiate past governments’ one-way trade deals, particularly with China and Mexico. Allowing corporations to move their factories to third-world countries with no environmental, labour or wage legislation and then ship their goods back here tariff-free makes absolutely no sense. It is a simple matter to re-instate countervailing duties. Governments – both Conservative and Liberal – had such policies in place for over a century prior to NAFTA. If the Trans-Pacific Partnership is implemented in Canada by the Harper regime, I would expect your government to repudiate and repeal it, in its entirety.
If your future government is willing to restore our constitutional freedoms and do what is necessary to bring good-paying manufacturing jobs back to Canada, even if it means displeasing Wall Street, and if your government does not succumb to the temptation of going overboard with socialism, I believe you can count on the support of millions of conservative Canadians.
Canadians have never opposed paying a reasonable level of taxation. However, we expect something in return. We want good roads, good schools, hospitals, fire departments, police as servants of the people, our neighbours taken care of in times of need. On the other hand, using our hard-earned tax money to fund a state spy grid, government corruption, Wall Street, the City of London, foreign aid to third-world despots, sending our military around the world to make the world safe for U.S. Dollar hegemony, and funding israeli government war crimes are NOT a wise use of our money. Or the lives of our young people, for that matter.
I am a conservative. And I am a union member. And I am willing to give your party a chance. This once.
In closing, should you be chosen by the people of Canada to be Prime Minister this Fall, I would expect you to lay down the law with your future caucus: If any member is found to be working for a foreign influence (i.e. a foreign government – even israel -, a globalist organization such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission or Bilderberg, or a bank or corporation) he or she will be expelled from caucus and your party. Mr. Mulcair, Libby Davies was right. And you were wrong.
P.S.: Please, sir. Don’t stab us in the back like Obama did to his supporters.
As you know, your friend Peter MacKay unexpectedly up and quit.
I am writing once again to make the same request of you.
Please gather up all of your belongings, walk past the senate, turn your badge into the security guard and get out of our sight.
In the past decade, you have done absolutely nothing for the Niagara region. On the contrary, plants have continued to close and jobs – real jobs, not part-time season gigs on Clifton Hill – have continued to disappear.
You have conspired with fellow low-lives MacKay, Victor Toews and Steven Blaney to bring in an American-style police state.
You have committed war crimes around the planet by overthrowing the legitimately elected government of Ukraine, supplying and arming the Poroshenko regime. You have given aid and comfort to war criminals in the israeli government. The Harper regime participated in overthrowing the Khadaffi regime and bringing civil war and destruction to what used to be the most prosperous country in North Africa.
You have brought similar death, destruction and misery to Syria but have yet been unsuccessful in bringing down that elected government. The people who live in those areas of Syria now subject to the ISIS regime and its brutal Sharia “law,” While Syria was never a particularly nice place to live under the Assads, at least they didn’t have decapitations and amputations.
You have knowingly lied to Canadians about events around the world. By advancing the popular narrative, you have been a participant in false flag terror events (namely: the shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 over Ukraine, the creation of “ISIS” and “Khorosan,” and the double homicide in Ottawa which took place last year).
You have subverted yourself personally to the government of israel, as has every other member of the Harper regime. Where I come from (Canada), that’s called treason.
Canada’s economic policy is created not for the benefit of the people of Canada, but by a privately-owned corporation across the street from your office which creates currency out of thin air and loans it to Canadians at interest. A corporation which acts on the behest of Goldman Sachs and other New York and City of London banksters. As attorney general, you did nothing to enforce the Bank of Canada Act, which requires among other things, that the Bank act as a credit creation instrument at no charge.
As foreign minister, you have exported your incompetence around the world, as the good people of Miami are finding out.
By bringing Canadian forces into the U.S. War of Terror, you have not only put our servicemen in danger overseas, but – by your own narrative – you have put Canadian citizens in danger right here at home.
As defense minister, you were complicit in torture carried out in Afghanistan and Guantanamo. Another war crime worthy of your prosecution and incarceration.
Your regime and its courts have put Canadians health in danger by refusing to regulate GMO foods. Worse, your regime has effectively adopted the U.S. “Monsanto Protection Act.”
Your regime has conspired with regimes around the world to implement worldwide fascism through the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Your office has refused to send me a text copy of this “agreement.”
Thirty of your partners-in-crime have seen the writing on the wall, Bob.
It’s pretty bad when we’ve gotten to the point where the only mainstream party that appears to be able to extricate Canadians from this mess and restore our freedoms is the N.D.P. My only fear is that a Prime Minister Thomas Mulcair will go Obama on us (i.e. as opposed to repairing the damage of the previous administration, only accelerating it).
As a conservative, I abhor socialism, big government, high taxes and structural deficits (i.e. what we have right now). But after eight years of incremental fascism under the Harper regime, socialism starts to look pretty good. The key is for Canadians to retain their freedoms to oppose whatever policies an NDP government might bring in and reverse them if necessary.
Now, Bob, I know that you, Peter and the rest of your cronies are counting on a nice Senate sinecure. After all, nothing is more dangerous than a cornered animal. Especially one who has nothing to lose. I hope you enjoy your gig there because I promise you that will be the last straw for Canadians.
We will take back our country and our freedoms, Bob. And you are frankly too old and too stupid to do anything to stop us. I’ve been telling you for six years: you are not going to get your new world order and you are not going to get your police state. You have failed your masters in Tel Aviv, New York and City of London.
Please, Bob…just get lost. And take Mrs. Quinney and that clueless dimwitted adolescent who answers your Niagara Falls constituency office phone with you.
And don’t let the cell door hit you on the way in.
P.S.: All these years and you made one mistake, Bob: You forgot to bring Diebold voting machines to Canada.
It will come as no surprise to your secretary, Mrs. Quinney, that I oppose your regime’s latest attack on our freedoms and liberties, Bill C-51.
For reasons that I have expanded upon in great deal in past correspondence, it is my firm conviction that there is no actual terrorism anywhere in the world. Only C.I.A. And Mossad agents. And misguided fools like your “Via rail” would-be bombers who don’t know that when they think they’re dealing with “al-qaeda” (i.e. al-ciada) they are, in fact, dealing with the very people who are causing them distress in the first place.
As you have no doubt noticed from the nationwide protests, “you’re either with us or you’re with the terrorists” doesn’t work any longer. Your friend, the former minister of government safety, current Manitoba supreme court judge and confirmed paedophile Victor Toews destroyed that argument for you. Like I said before, Bob, you can have access to my computers when I get to knock on your door and see yours.
The section of your legislation criminalizing the identification or publication of CSIS “agents” is of particular interest to me. Does that mean Canadian media would be forbidden from telling us how Mohammed al-Rashed, a CSIS agent who is not a Canadian citizen, was caught trying to smuggle three British girls into Syria to fight for “ISIS?” And furthermore, Bob, you wouldn’t happen to know the minister who would be responsible for getting Rashed his Canadian citizenship on the Q.T. after he completed his mission (whatever that mission was), would you? Bob?
You’re a lawyer, Bob. So, I was curious: is there any law currently on the books which forbids giving aid and comfort to our (purported) sworn enemies? Too bad our American friends don’t have such a law. If they did, the federal bureau of incineration could arrest the pilots of the aircraft who have been dropping food and weapons to “ISIS” all across Syria and Iraq. And Arizona senator John “Insane” McCain could be arrested for meeting with “ISIS” members, including the same men in one of Rita Katz’s beheading movies.
Your regime has put me in a difficult position, Bob. I am a conservative in the mould of Preston Manning. I have been voting P.C., Reform, Alliance and Conservative since I was old enough to cast a ballot. You are not a conservative, Bob. Your are a regime of fascist, criminal thugs. In the next election, there are no other issues for me other than freedom and liberty. If I have to vote NDP to accomplish that goal, that is what I am going to do. I oppose higher taxes. Global warming is a hoax. The NDP is a party of gun grabbers, but it’s not as if your party was going to move in the direction of more firearms freedoms anyway. You have never repudiated the global warming fraud. And thanks to your regime, I now pay provincial sales tax on my utility bills and gasoline. Under an NDP government, I’ll deal with those issues as they arise. Their leader may be an avowed israel-firster, but I know their membership (both rank-and-file and in the house itself) are not. See Libby Davies.
If ending the War of Terror and the “war on drugs” can only be accomplished under an NDP government, then I am left with no choice but to vote NDP. And I don’t even smoke or drink. And I know “terrorism,” as you define it, as a contrived Orwellian hoax.
I abhor the policies of the NDP. But if having to live through four years of Thomas Mulcair is the kick in the ass your party needs to finally elect a Libertarian conservative (like Steve presented himself as, only for real), I will be voting Conservative again. But there is no way I will ever vote for a Conservative party led by, or even populated with, any member of your current regime. And I sure as hell won’t be voting for you, Bob.
I also note your regime’s proposed legislation identifies threats to my country’s “economic security.” I’ve got a really good idea, Bob: why don’t you send the RCMP across the street and arrest Steven Poloz and every other denizen inside the Bank of Canada building if you are so concerned about the economic well-being of Canada? And don’t forget to issue an extradition warrant for Mark Carney.
You are a war criminal, Bob. So is Harper and ever other member of your regime. You overthrew the elected government of Ukraine in favour of a new world order stooge. This has caused a civil war in Ukraine resulting in deaths and injuries numbering in the thousands. Not to mention untold misery to the Ukrainian people. And you personally have supplied its criminal regime with money, comfort and materiel. On top of all of that, in light of your friend Mohammed al-Rashed, now it looks like you’re guilty of treason. Before Ukraine, you did much the same thing in Libya. You’ve tried (and failed) to do so in Syria. You know your patrons in Tel Aviv will never get a war going in Iran because that is when Russia and China will pull the plug on dollar hegemony once and for all.
I don’t know how to tell you this, Bob: but it looks like Dean Del Mastro, Mike Duffy, Patrick Brazeau and Pamela Wallin aren’t going to be the only ones going to prison.
Here’s the bottom line, Bob: First, any further attack on my freedoms, liberties and natural-born rights are absolutely unacceptable. Before I assume room temperature, I intend to take back the ones that successive regimes have already taken away.
Second: I don’t trust you. I don’t trust your regime. I don’t even like you.
Third: Osirak. Babies being thrown out of incubators. 9/11. Building Seven. Saddam’s Nukular Bombs. Anwar Awlaki. Joseph Cohen. Adam Pearlmen. Zachary Chesser. Russia grabbed Crimea and invaded Ukraine. The Ottawa double homicides.
Fourth: Given the behaviour of police workers – specifically during and since the 2010 Toronto police riots – and going back decades in general, I am disinclined to trust them with any degree of authority. Secret investigations and warrantless searches are out of the question. We have seen from the experience of our American friends that everything the national security state does now is done so in the name of fighting “terrorism.” As I have been telling you for six years now: I’ll be damned if I’ll ever let you get away with that in my country, Bob.
I am not specifically writing to you, Bob. Because that would imply that you are acting as a legitimate government with my consent. You are not. And you are not. This letter is for the public archives. Assuming this e-mail is not stored on Kathleen Wynne’s, Lois Lerner’s or Hillary Clinton’s hard drives, decades from now future historians studying great constitutional restorations in Canada and abroad will know that people like me stood up to petty, impotent, self-important, self-grandizing, corrupt tinpot dictators like yourself.
I also understand e-mails such as mine are also reviewed and stored by the Communications Security Establishment, among other entities. Again, Bob, not to suggest that this happens with my consent or approval. But I do request they spell my name correctly. That’s one “e” at the end. Got it, Bob?
Bob, remember when the idea of a massive international spy grid, government surveilling and, best of all, the “five eyes” was the stuff of wacko conspiracy theory nonsense? What else have the tinfoil hats been right about, Bob?
Robert Nicholson<email@example.com>;Stephen Harper<firstname.lastname@example.org>;Joe Oliver<email@example.com>;firstname.lastname@example.org<email@example.com>;Chris Alexander<firstname.lastname@example.org>;email@example.com<firstname.lastname@example.org>;email@example.com<firstname.lastname@example.org>;Peter MacKay<email@example.com>;Peter van Loan<firstname.lastname@example.org>;Jason Kenney<email@example.com>;James Moore<firstname.lastname@example.org>;Irwin Cotler<email@example.com>;Justin Trudeau<firstname.lastname@example.org>;email@example.com<firstname.lastname@example.org>;Thomas Mulcair<email@example.com>;firstname.lastname@example.org<email@example.com>;
Don’t even think about it.
The picture of the guy running away after being “shot in the back” at the israeli-owned Westgate Mall in Kenya pretty much told me all I need to know. Testimony coming out in the “Via Rail” trial, where these guys were supposedly going to “blow up” that bridge down the street from my house…uh, yeah. They are your guys, Bob. Just like I said they would be two years ago.
Seriously, are you crooks up there in Ottawa so stupid and so disconnected from the rest of the planet that you don’t realize the entire world is wise to the scam of false flag terrorism?
Adam Ghadan was Adam Pearlman before he “converted.” Joseph Cohen became Yousef al-Khatab. Zachary Chesser became known as Abu Talhah al-Amrikee.
I’ve got a really, good idea, though, Bob. Let’s say I’m all wet and there ARE real terrorists and they REALLY do hate us for our freedoms and the brown people REALLY are pissed off at us and we REALLY all gonna die. In that eventuality, maybe it’s time for you guys to make yourselves useful and pass emergency legislation and bestow the right of firearm ownership, conceal carry and open carry upon Canadian citizens. I don’t want anything fancy like an M-16 or even an A.K., Bob. Just a Glock with an couple of extra clips will do.
That heater that the police worker was pointing at the crowd up there in Ottawa looks pretty cool, too. Of course, when you have a tiny little schlong and you used to get beat up in school, you have to go around dressed like Darth Vader and point a big gun at unarmed Canadian citizens in order to compensate for it. He probably arrived at the homicide scene in a GMC Yukon.
It really is miraculous how, in countries like Canada, France, Australia, etc., where firearms are strictly controlled, the “terrorists” seem to have no problem finding them. And citizens are left to be slaughtered. But as long as government is kept safe, that’s all that counts. Isn’t that right, Bob?
Isn’t it funny how citizens in Iraq and Libya, for example, used to go around carrying all sorts of automatic weapons. And almost every house had a gun. So I guess if you really want firearms freedom, you have to live in a country run by a tyrannical despot. Kinda makes me wonder why we don’t have such freedoms in Canada.
Can you imagine if those just one of those gals at Ecole Polytechnique was carrying back in 1989, Bob? Or, speaking of 1989, what would happen if one – just one – of Paul Bernardo’s would-be victims back in his Scarborough Rapist days had a Glock in her purse? Leslie Mahaffy, Kristen French and even Tammy Homolka would be alive today. But no, Bob. Your woman, Kim Campbell, “Conservative” minister of justice, said Canadians can’t even have stun guns. You might want to revisit what Kim did for the Conservative party in 1993, Bob, because history will repeat itself this year. But I digress.
Failing all that, Bob, hows about you make available to Canadians the same body armour you sent over to the Poroshenko regime in The Ukraine so we can protect ourselves from this imminent threat of yours? I mean, if it’s good enough for the Ukrainian mercenary army, it ought to be good enough for us.
No more false flag terror attacks. And no more advancing of the police state and national security state. It’s gone too far. Got it, Bob?