Yeah, yeah. I know. tinfoil hat. Conspiracy kook, space aliens, etc, etc. Like those of us who engage in critical thinking haven’t heard that a million times before.
Just one question: What has government NOT lied about (just once) in the past, say, fifty years? Governments and media have lied so often and so convincingly for decades that only an idiot would just take their word for it. On anything.
We have the means to independently verify every fact we are exposed to. So grow a brain and start verifying.
Within hours of the shootings in Ottawa, websites which purported to “debunk” false flag claims came out of nowhere and rose to the top of Google searches.
“Establishment” media worked tirelessly to scrub any hint of dissent or inquiry from their comments sections. They are still reporting on this event (particularly Michael Zehaf-Bibeau’s “conversion to Islam angle”) however most comments are now disabled.
The most obvious question is this: how did Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, after shooting Nathan Cirillo manage to make the roughly-400-yard trek from the War Memorial to the Centre Block of the Parliament Buildings? Two hundred yards of that 400 would have been on the grounds of Parliament Hill itself. The parliament buildings resemble an armed camp any day of the year, never mind when parliament is in session and the prime minister and his cabinet are on the premises.
Did the entire RCMP security contingent and House of Commons Protective Services go on one big stand down? According to police reports, ten minutes elapsed between the time Cirillo (who was guarding the War Memorial with an unloaded rifle) was shot and the time Bibeau entered the Centre Block. It is absolutely unfathomable to believe that in the time it took Bibeau to make the 200-yard dash across the grounds from Wellington Street (after hopping the fence), armed officers wouldn’t be at the front door to greet him. Such incompetence on the part of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police would be like suggesting that the entire air defenses of the United States government stood down on September 11, 2001. Absolutely incomprehensible.
The narrative tells us that the House’s the sergeant-at-arms Kevin Vickers heroically shot Bibeau with his sidearm. Was Bibeau meant to get further? Was Vickers’ presence overlooked in crafting the script? Was Vickers set up to be the hero all along (they sure had his biography ready for the media in a hurry)? We may never know. I lean towards the former. Vickers’ actions give ammunition (pun intended) to opponents of gun control who maintain the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. Too bad Cirillo couldn’t be trusted with a loaded gun.
In every “mass shooting” (and I concede this wasn’t technically a mass shooting; Vickers stopped it in its tracks), you have a “hero narrative.” That would be Vickers. However, in this instance, you also have cowardice. Michelle Rempel, M.P. For Calgary North, tweeted, Mom im okay Im in hiding. Yeah, that the image we want our “leaders” to project. Hiding and sending twitter messages to their mothers. Of course, if Rempel is anything like my M.P., Rob Nicholson, she’s been in hiding since the day she was elected. It is worth noting that in most of Alberta, if a chimpanzee were allowed to stand for office, he would be elected provided he ran as a Conservative. It’s just that easy.
Then there was Stephen “Steve” Harper. While receiving a briefing about the “situation” from R.C.M.P. Commissioner Robert “Bob” Paulson, Harper was drinking a glass of wine. So either Harper, who claims to be a teetotaler, “suffers” from alcoholism so severe that he not only needs to drink on the job but will allow himself to be photographed while doing so. Or, was Steve so confident that the script was being followed as planned that he allowed himself to feel relaxed. Not unlike George W. Bush reading My Pet Goat (upside down) while his country was literally under attack.
While the shooting incidents were unfolding, the RCMP presumed to direct citizens not to upload cellphone photos and videos. Apparently, they don’t possess cellphone killers unlike their American colleagues.
Fortunately, none of their officers channeled Paul Vance, the Connecticut State Police employee who threatened to arrest anybody reporting information about Sandy Hook that didn’t come explicitly from him.
The Ottawa “attack” was preceded by a hit-and-run incident two days earlier in Quebec which resulted in the injury of one soldier, whose identify has not been released and the death of another , Patrice Vincent. The incident was quickly held up by the Harper regime as “homegrown terrorism,” even as the Quebec provincial police were conducting an independent investigation. The suspect in the hit-and-run, Martin “Ahmad” (of course) Rouleau, another Muslim “convert,” was subsequently shot and killed by police.
On October 16, a week before the Ottawa shooting incident and four days prior to the Quebec hit-and-run incident, public safety minister Steven Blaney (CON-Quebec City) announced legislation which would “crack down” on “homegrown terrorists” and give the spy agency CSIS (Canadian Security Intelligence Service) more powers, particularly with regards to its relationships with other members of the “Five Eyes.”
On October 23, the day after the Ottawa shootings, it was reported that the Harper regime was considering legislation which would make it an offense to “condone” terrorist acts on-line.
From the National Post of October 23:
Sources suggest the government is likely to bring in new hate speech legislation that would make it illegal to claim terrorist acts are justified online.
The Prime Minister told the House of Commons on Thursday that Canada’s law and policing powers need to be strengthened in the areas of surveillance, detention and arrest. He said work is already under way to provide law enforcement agencies with “additional tools” and that work will now be expedited.
The Conservative MP (unnamed in the original article) said the new legislation was crafted before this week’s events and is not “trauma tainted.”
There you have it. Problem. Reaction. Solution.
Michael Zehaf-Bibeau was said to be depressed, mentally ill and a drug addict. And he had a history of petty crime. A perfect candidate, as it turns out, for an interested party to mold him into their own image.
The subject of “mind control” is generally relegated to late night talk radio and / or radio programming originating out of Austin, Texas.
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’s long-running investigative documentary program The Fifth Estate ran a segment called The Sleep Room in 1984. The report documented the C.I.A.’s role in sleep deprivation, mind control and other psychological warfare experiments at Montreal’s Allan Memorial Institute in the 1950s and 1960s. The experiments were overseen by psychiatrist Donald Ewen Cameron. The experiments supposedly ended when Cameron died in 1967. Cameron’s “work” was part of a larger program known as Project MK (Mind Kontrol) Ultra.
SSRIs and other anti anti-depressants figure prominently into both mass-shootings as well as contrived “terrorist” plots which the Federal Bureau Incineration and Royal Canadian Mounted Police always seem to be breaking up.
Mitchell Johnson, who was 13 years old in 1998 when he and his then-11-year-old cousin Andrew Golden shot and killed five people and wounded 11 others, was being “treated” with anti-depressants. Eric Harris, one of the two (that we know of) Columbine shooters was similarly being treated.
Seung Hui Cho was mentally ill when he shot up Virginia Tech.
In fact, you would be hard-pressed to find a “mass-shooting” incident where mental illness compounded with prescription anti-depressants didn’t play a major role.
Of course, if you really want to wave a red flag in front of the gun-grabbers and enrage them until there is mucus spraying out of their noses, bring up the fact that all of these “mass-shootings” happened in places where guns were banned. Either by the institution or business where they happened, or the state they happened in. Even in carry states, having a gun in a business or institution that has banned it is treated as illegal possession. Mind you, had Michael Zehaf-Bibeau carried out his attack at the U.S. Capitol instead of Ottawa, Canada, and had U.S. Capitol police stood down just like the R.C.M.P., we can be certain he wouldn’t have gotten past Dianne Feinstein.
When the FBI and the RCMP break up the contrived “terror plots,” the participants are always drug addicts or otherwise troubled young people. Just like our Mr. Bibeau. John Nuttall and Amanda Korody, the Vancouver-area couple charged with “plotting” to blow up the B.C. Legislature, were recovering drug addicts who were receiving methadone treatments from a neighborhood pharmacy. They lived in a basement apartment. They were jobless. Oh, yes, they were also Muslim converts. It is interesting to note that their local mosque had thrown them out because they were troublemakers. Nuttall and Korody were expressing sentiments which were sympathetic to al-Qaeda (which they apparently didn’t know was al-ciada).
We can be certain, however, that in this case and every plot that has been broken up, the public was never, ever in danger because as RCMP Deputy Commissioner Wayne Rideout said (referring to the Nuttall / Korody case): “(the RCMP used a variety of techniques to) monitor and control (the accused throughout their conspiracy)…the suspects were committed to acts of violence and discussed a wide variety of targets and techniques. In order to ensure public safety, we employed a variety of complex investigative and covert techniques to control any opportunity the suspects had to commit harm.” In other words, they have their man on the inside and won’t let things get out of hand. Unless, of course, they need to.
Parliament Hill shooter kicked out of Burnaby mosque two years ago
Zehaf-Bibeau was asked to leave the mosque, because he had “gotten a hold of keys and stuff from the mosque, and when he got out of jail, he just started sleeping there”
The list of mass-shootings, terror plots (contrived, successful and otherwise) that feature SSRIs, mental illness, drug addiction and other “strange” people is just too long to be covered in this article. However, it is safe to say we can add Michael Zehaf-Bibeau to the list.
I am not suggesting that Stephen Harper personally ordered this attack. I don’t believe any member of the Harper regime “ordered” it or had it carried out. Any number of organizations could have been “in on it.” The C.I.A. and the Mossad (israel) come to mind first and foremost. The Council on Foreign Relations has become one of Harper’s most reliable patrons. The C.F.R., headed by David Rockefeller, counts among its most legendary members war criminals Henry Kissinger, Richard “Penis” Cheney and Richard Haas. When it comes to terrorism (whether it be the traditional blow-stuff-up kind, the tyrannical police-state kind, the takeover-non-compliant-government-kind or the more genteel, kinder, softer Goldman-Sachs-rob-the-bank-wearing-an-Armani-suit kind), the Council on Foreign Relations takes a back seat to nobody. With the possible exception of the Trilateral Commission, of whom James Moore, M.P., (CON-Port Moody-Westwood-Port Conquitlam) and current Industry minister is a member. (Hey, Jim, I’ve taken a screenshot from your website so don’t bother trying to memory hole it).
As one can see by visiting the official website of the Prime Minister’s Office, Steve is a frequent visitor to the C.F.R.
Speaking of Goldman Sachs, it just so happens that Steve was down in the City speaking at their world headquarters. Among other things, he discussed the problem of young people going overseas and becoming terrorists. Strangely though, the phenomenon of young Canadians and Americans participating in war crimes and terrorism for the israeli Occupation Army didn’t come up.
There are no real terrorists. At least, not the Hollywood-type Central Casting terrorists we have been trained to fear. The people around the world whose lives have been destroyed by israeli, American, “federal” “reserve” and other bankster aggression know the end of dollar hegemony is near. And with it, the end of the War Of Terror. Furthermore, they know that the very people who live in countries governed by their attackers have had it.
Britain said it would not participate in Iraq III. So what is “ISIS’s” response? Kidnap a Brit, cut his head off and post the video in order to get the Brits so riled up they will want to change their minds and destroy ISIS. Turkey would not allow the U.S. and its allies to use its airspace. So what does ISIS do? It sends missiles across the border from Syria. Canada didn’t participate in Iraq II (the 2003 Shock and Awe / Mission Accomplished thing). Canadians are just as opposed now as we were over a decade ago. So what does ISIS do? Attack Canada and get the Canadian people angry and demanding blood. None of this makes any sense.
If you want to invade a country because peoples’ heads are being cut off, you might want to start with Saudi Arabia.
I knew why, because I had been through the Pentagon right after 9/11. About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, “Sir, you’ve got to come in and talk to me a second.” I said, “Well, you’re too busy.” He said, “No, no.” He says, “We’ve made the decision we’re going to war with Iraq.” This was on or about the 20th of September. I said, “We’re going to war with Iraq? Why?” He said, “I don’t know.” He said, “I guess they don’t know what else to do.” So I said, “Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?” He said, “No, no.” He says, “There’s nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq.” He said, “I guess it’s like we don’t know what to do about terrorists, but we’ve got a good military and we can take down governments.” And he said, “I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail.”
So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, “Are we still going to war with Iraq?” And he said, “Oh, it’s worse than that.” He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, “I just got this down from upstairs” — meaning the Secretary of Defense’s office — “today.” And he said, “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” I said, “Is it classified?” He said, “Yes, sir.” I said, “Well, don’t show it to me.” And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, “You remember that?” He said, “Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!”
—General Wesley Clark, March 2, 2007
In Canada, elections do not have constitutionally-mandated dates. However, by law (which can be repealed), set election dates every four years on the third Monday in October. This would require an election on October 19, 2015. Harper ignored this law during his last mandate and called an early election on May 2, 2011. HOWEVER…the constitution sets the maximum life of a government at five years (which would take the regime through to May, 2016). In event of a national emergency (war, insurrection or disaster), a government can even exceed its five-year lifespan with the consent of 2/3 of all members of parliaments. Since the ruling Conservative Party only has 161 of the 308 seats, that is a highly unlikely circumstance; it would require 42 more votes than it currently has).
Historically, in Canada, governments that remain in office more than four years are regarded as seriously in trouble with the voters. In October, 2016, the Harper regime’s mandate will have been four years and five months into its mandate.
Canadians, Americans, Britons and mainland Europeans have had it with their governments. We have had it with usurpation by israel. We have had it with the banksters. The Dollar is near death. The regimes have tried everything else and failed. Now all they have left (short of nukes) is the false flag. And this week, it was Canada’s turn.